This company has verified ownership of the profile and can respond to reviews.
Verified Safe
Current checks include security-provider warnings. Review the detected warnings and supporting trust evidence before relying on the site.
Trust signal radarNormalized trust signals for coffergroup.comDomain Maturity: 7876 daysDomain MaturityWarning Cleanliness: 3 detectionsWarningCleanlinessSafety Level: 0 negative tagsSafetyLevelPositive Signals: 2 positive signalsPositiveSignalsPopularity: Estimated low traffic without Tranco or social profile dataPopularityTrust Zone: .comTrust ZoneOperational Signals: 0 detected servicesOperationalSignalsLocation Credibility: Hosting country USLocation Credibility
Figure 1. Trust signal radar for coffergroup.com. Larger shaded area indicates stronger trust signals.
How we scored coffergroup.com
On-page mentions:
Cybersecurity
Tech signals:
Wordpress Platform, SEO Optimization
Positive signals:
a long-term domain history (21.6 years)
the domain owner has claimed this profile
Negative signals:
security-provider warnings
Context signals:
content related to cybersecurity tools for malware and phishing defense
Last checked August 27, 2026 at 11:47 PM by
Gridinsoft Trust Model v2.5.3
Share this report?
Independent Gridinsoft analysis
What Gridinsoft observed on coffergroup.com
A Gridinsoft threat analyst reviewed the site directly and documented the evidence behind this decision.
Current review
Review ID
GMA-20260827234704-2a86cb79
Reviewed
by Gridinsoft Threat Analyst
Analyst finding
Safe
Evidence basis
First-party site analysisExternal vendor intelligence: Contradictory context — not used for this decision
The independent current review supports Safe for coffergroup.com. The historical compromise was genuine: during the reported July window, the exact root page requested an unrelated external JavaScript response and contacted Polygon RPC services, and OTX subsequently grouped the domain under Compromised by ClickFix. That evidence is an exact behavior trace rather than a blacklist inference, although it does not preserve an executable payload. The current state is materially different. All 29 published HTML URLs and 21 same-origin scripts returned expected site content without the historical infrastructure or loader markers; six fresh request profiles and three later public browser scans likewise reproduced no malicious redirect, credential-theft flow, remote-command instruction, payload, or automatic download. Remaining adverse vendor and threat-intelligence results are broad domain labels and do not demonstrate current harmful behavior. Safe describes the public deployment reviewed now and does not erase the confirmed July compromise.
Analyst findings
Info4
Info01
The July compromise is confirmed by an exact behavior trace
The July 23 root-page scan preserved a request from coffergroup.com to an unrelated external JavaScript endpoint and Polygon RPC activity in the same session; OTX independently grouped the domain under Compromised by ClickFix. This is more specific than a domain blacklist label. The accessible evidence does not preserve an executable payload or establish that one was delivered in that scan session.
Info02
The injected request chain is no longer reproduced
All 29 current published pages, 21 same-origin scripts, six request profiles, and three later public browser scans omit the historical external JavaScript host and Polygon RPC traffic. No current malicious redirect, credential-theft flow, automatic download, malware file, or remote-command instruction was reproduced.
Info03
Remaining warnings are domain labels, not a current harmful sample
CRDF, CyRadar, alphaMountain.ai, and OTX preserve domain-level adverse context, but the accessible current records do not identify a currently reachable harmful URL, response, credential receiver, file, payload, redirect chain, or hash. They document historical reputation and blacklist state, not continuation of the removed July behavior.
Info04
The current broad Gridinsoft category lacks a reproducible basis
The fresh Gridinsoft-owned report reached the expected site and recorded no current positive behavior finding, while the complete published surface no longer reproduces the July injected chain. Retaining a current domain-wide Suspicious Website category would therefore conflict with the current first-party evidence.
Review 6 documented observations
View evidence
01Historical content
A public browser scan from 2026-07-23, within the reported incident window, recorded the exact coffergroup.com root page requesting a 388-byte external JavaScript response from https://authorization-id-browser.info/api.php. The same page session also contacted Polygon RPC services. The external response had SHA-256 a981272f96749b77b62ad0bf1c0db0a08b65e00cccee2dd8f86535047dca889c. OTX subsequently listed coffergroup.com in a pulse named Compromised by ClickFix. This is a preserved behavior trace tied to the root page, not merely a blacklist category. The accessible record does not preserve an executable payload or prove that one was delivered in that session.
Public artifact URLhttps://urlscan.io/result/019f8fc5-d47d-703a-a35a-050bb21b7711/
Public artifact URLhttps://otx.alienvault.com/indicator/domain/coffergroup.com
Final URLhttps://authorization-id-browser.info/api.php
Analyst observationThe July 23 browser trace attributes the external script request to https://coffergroup.com/ and records a contemporaneous Polygon RPC request in the same session.
02Navigation
The current WordPress API and sitemap exposed 29 unique published HTML URLs: 22 pages and seven posts. Every URL returned HTTP 200 on coffergroup.com. The complete reviewed HTML and its 21 same-origin JavaScript resources contained no reference to authorization-id-browser.info, the historical Polygon RPC services, ClickFix, PowerShell, clipboard instructions, an automatic executable or archive download, or an unrelated final redirect.
HTTP status200
Final URLhttps://coffergroup.com/wp-sitemap.xml
Analyst observationAll 29 unique published HTML URLs returned HTTP 200 at coffergroup.com.
Analyst observationTwenty-one same-origin JavaScript resources were retrieved; neither the HTML nor those scripts referenced the historical external script host, the historical RPC endpoints, ClickFix, PowerShell, or clipboard instructions.
Analyst observationNo reviewed page exposed an executable or archive download link, and no reviewed page redirected to an unrelated final host.
03Form
The current public site presents ordinary same-origin Gravity Forms contact forms. The dedicated contact page accepts a name, email address, inquiry type, message, and an optional business-document upload. Other reviewed pages reuse a same-origin name, email, subject, and message form. No password, one-time code, payment-card, wallet, or remote-command field was present, and no form or upload was submitted during the review.
HTTP status200
Final URLhttps://coffergroup.com/contact-us/
Page elementSame-origin Gravity Forms contact forms request ordinary contact details and messages; the contact page also exposes a documented business-file upload field.
Analyst observationNo reviewed form requested a password, one-time code, payment-card value, wallet secret, or remote-command execution.
04HTTP response
Fresh desktop, mobile, Google crawler, Bing crawler, Gridinsoft, and Google-referrer requests all returned HTTP 200 at the same HTTPS root with the expected Coffer Group business page. HTTP and www requests converged on https://coffergroup.com/. A fresh supported Gridinsoft report also reached the expected page with HTTP 200, showed the ordinary WordPress and business-content resources, and recorded no current positive behavior signal or exact harmful object.
HTTP status200
Final URLhttps://coffergroup.com/
MIME typetext/html; charset=UTF-8
Public artifact URLhttps://gridinsoft.com/online-virus-scanner/url/coffergroup-com
Analyst observationSix fresh request profiles reached the expected Coffer Group page and contained none of the historical script host, RPC services, or ClickFix markers.
05Historical content
Public browser records establish a time-bounded change. The July 23 scan included the external authorization-id-browser.info script and Polygon RPC traffic. Scans from August 6, August 7, and August 9 loaded the expected coffergroup.com, WP Engine, WordPress analytics, Google, and LinkedIn resources without the historical external script host or RPC services; urlscan recorded no adverse verdict for those later scans.
Public artifact URLhttps://urlscan.io/result/019fd84e-7858-7630-a051-b501c6a72677/
Public artifact URLhttps://urlscan.io/result/019fdc0e-1e78-7039-b864-169faa4326c6/
Public artifact URLhttps://urlscan.io/result/019fe87e-aba0-73ba-9ac1-a555824b4506/
Analyst observationThree later public browser scans omitted both authorization-id-browser.info and the Polygon RPC traffic seen during the July incident.
06Historical content
OTX retains one domain-level ClickFix pulse dated 2026-07-26, matching the reported incident window. The fresh external snapshot retained CRDF and CyRadar malicious or malware labels and one alphaMountain.ai suspicious label, while 57 engines reported harmless. Public exact-domain searches found no additional result in Hybrid Analysis, ANY.RUN, Triage, Joe Sandbox, URLQuery, URLhaus, or ThreatFox. Wayback exposed ordinary 2026 captures through May but no capture for the July incident window or the later August state. The remaining adverse records are broad domain categories and do not identify a currently reachable harmful path, response, file, payload, or hash.
Public artifact URLhttps://otx.alienvault.com/indicator/domain/coffergroup.com
Public artifact URLhttps://web.archive.org/web/*/https://coffergroup.com/
Analyst observationThe fresh external snapshot contained 57 harmless results, two malicious results, one suspicious result, and 30 undetected results; the adverse engines supplied domain blacklist labels rather than a current behavior trace.
Analyst observationPublic sandbox and threat-intelligence indexes beyond urlscan and OTX supplied no additional exact-domain result; unavailable or authentication-only sources were treated as unverified, not clean.
Scope and limitations
The review covered coffergroup.com, its current sitemap and WordPress-published pages, the exact root behavior, public forms without submission, and publicly indexed history at the recorded time; it does not deny the confirmed July compromise.
The review did not access the private server filesystem, database, WordPress administrator, hosting account, source repository, deployment pipeline, backups, endpoint telemetry, or server logs, so internal remediation and persistence checks were not independently audited.
The July browser trace preserved the injected external JavaScript request and related RPC traffic, but the external JavaScript body was not available for independent content inspection and no executable payload was preserved. The review therefore does not claim that the scan session downloaded an executable or displayed a complete ClickFix lure.
No contact, file-upload, client-portal, administrative, or authenticated form was submitted.
Public search, URL-scan, sandbox, threat-intelligence, and archive indexes are incomplete. Authentication-required or unavailable sources were treated as unverified, not clean.
Safe describes the current observed public security behavior and does not guarantee future content, infrastructure integrity, private services, or immunity from another compromise.
We reviewed coffergroup.com and found mostly positive signals. Current checks lean toward a legitimate, lower-risk profile, although a few caution points still keep it short of a fully verified standing. The current trust score is 89/100. Key signals include security-provider warnings and a domain age of 21.6 years. Verify key details before sharing personal information or relying on the site for important actions.
FAQ
Is coffergroup.com safe?
Based on current analysis, coffergroup.com appears to be generally safe. The final verdict also reflects manual expert review. Basic verification is still reasonable before relying on the site.
Why does coffergroup.com look trustworthy?
Key factors include registrar information (pair Networks, Inc. d/b/a pair Domains), hosting in US, and content related to cybersecurity tools for malware and phishing defense. The trust score blends security detections, domain and infrastructure signals, and on-page behavior patterns. Taken together, these factors support a mostly positive trust assessment, although routine verification is still reasonable.
Coffergroup Digital Footprints
A structured view of the site's detected themes, page signals, and related online footprint elements.
Cybersecurity
Wordpress Platform
Our analyzer determines that this website is using WordPress CMS. WordPress is the most popular content management system, powering over 43% of websites globally.
Google Tag Manager
This website uses Google Tag Manager to add and update tracking tags on its website.
SEO Optimization
The coffergroup.com website employs search engine optimization (SEO) techniques to improve its visibility and ranking in search engine results pages (SERPs).
jQuery Library
Established Domain
This site has maintained active domain presence over time, indicating operational continuity.
Claimed Company Profile
The company behind this site has claimed its profile in the Gridinsoft portal and provided verified ownership details.
External provider warnings: 3/27
This section shows what independent external security sources say about this site.
A warning appears when one or more sources report malware, phishing, abuse, or other safety concerns. Each row shows the source and its verdict.
If no source reports a warning, the site is shown as clear in this section.
CRDF
Malicious
CyRadar
Malware
alphaMountain.ai
Suspicious
External provider results for Coffergroup.com, last checked August 27, 2026.
— VirusTotal
Domain Information
CreatedMarch 4, 2005 at 6:37 AMUpdated: June 26, 2026 at 11:07 PM · Expires: March 4, 2027 at 6:37 AM
Domain Age21.6 years
RegistrantPersonal information withheldProtected by Gridinsoft
Registration countryUnited States
Registrarpair Networks, Inc. d/b/a pair DomainsIANA ID: 99
If you own Coffergroup.com and want to challenge the trust score, please submit a review request via portal.gridinsoft.com. There you can claim your profile and add verified company/contact details. If you cannot access the portal, email legal(at)gridinsoft.com with proof of legitimacy and contact details. We never charge website owners for reviews or reconsideration requests. For more information, please review our Disclaimer.
A website report warns you. A PC scan protects you.
Unsafe sites can leave adware, unwanted apps, or hidden malware in downloads and browser settings. Run Gridinsoft Anti-Malware to check what may already be on this Windows PC.
Checks active threats, startup items, and suspicious downloads
Finds adware and unwanted apps linked to unsafe websites
Shows scan results before you decide what to remove
Your comment is currently undergoing moderation and will be published shortly.
Help protect others by sharing this page on social media! The more people who know about coffergroup.com, the fewer chances they have to deceive someone else.Help others evaluate coffergroup.com by sharing this page on social media!
Help protect others by sharing this page on social media! The more people who know about coffergroup.com, the fewer chances they have to deceive someone else. Help others evaluate coffergroup.com by sharing this page on social media!